Quantcast
Channel: Moviefone Gary Susman RSS Feed - Moviefone
Viewing all 949 articles
Browse latest View live

The 11 Most Terrifying Vampire Movies Ever Made

$
0
0
Remember when vampire movies were actually scary?

Sorry, Twihards and "Underworld" fans, but your brooding romantic neck-biters and your leather-clad Eurotrash vamps may be cool, but they're not frightening. If you want scary, go back to the likes of Bela Lugosi in the original "Dracula," which turns 85 this week (it was released on Feb. 14, 1931). Or Christopher Lee as Hammer's Dracula, or the pack-hunting bloodsuckers of some more recent films.

Here are 11 vampire movies that are actually terrifying.the 11 most terrifying vampire movies ever made

7 Reasons Why 'Deadpool' Smashed All Expectations at the Box Office

$
0
0
That "Deadpool" opened No. 1 at the box office this weekend isn't a shocker. Analysts expected it to debut with around $65 million. They were off by, you know, only about $70 million.

According to estimates, the snarky, sword-happy superhero actually brought in $135.0 million from Friday to Sunday -- with a likely $150 million haul by the end of the four-day President's Day weekend.

In addition to having the biggest opening weekend ever for an R-rated movie, and R-rated comic book movie (sorry, "300" and your puny $70.8 million), "Deadpool's" debut smashed all kinds of records. It's the biggest Februrary debut weekend ever (beating the $85.1 million earned a year ago by "Fifty Shades of Grey"). It's the biggest winter-season opening ever (ahead of last winter's "American Sniper," which went wide with $89.2 million in January 2015). And it's the biggest debut ever for 20th Century Fox (beating 2005's "Star Wars: Episode III -- Revenge of the Sith," at $108.4 million).

So how did predictors miss the mark by more than half? Here are some possible reasons why "Deadpool" did better than anyone anticipated.

1. An Epidemic of Underestimation
Truth is, the pundits have been off their game for at least a year when it comes to surprise blockbusters. They lowballed predictions for such 2015 hits as "San Andreas," "Pitch Perfect 2," and "Straight Outta Compton." They were off by about $80 million for "Jurassic World," which broke the record for biggest opening weekend of all time, until "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" opened even bigger six months later.

Why are the experts so far off? In some cases (especially "Pitch Perfect 2" and "Compton"), they ignored the hunger felt by largely underserved audiences to have a movie that didn't just appeal to them but even represented them. In some cases, the movies surprised analysts by succeeding during what are traditionally not peak moviegoing seasons.

Certainly, February is usually a fallow month for moviegoing. Plus, "Deadpool" had a hard R rating, a leading man with a mixed track record at best, and no 3D surcharges. Opening on Valentine's Day weekend, "Deadpool" didn't exactly seem like an ideal date movie. So there are several reasons why experts expected the movie to do only half as well as it did. Nonetheless, "Deadpool" managed to turn many of these weaknesses into strengths. For instance...

2. R-rated Comic Book Movies are Still a Novelty
To date, there have been only a handful, most of them based on less-than-mainstream titles such as "300," "Kick-Ass," "Kingsman: The Secret Service," (above) and "2 Guns." Only a few have come from well-known comic series or graphic novels, like "The Punisher," "Watchmen" and the "Blade" trilogy. "Deadpool" stepped into an empty arena full of creative possibilities, and curious audiences flocked to see how the filmmakers might exploit those freedoms. Here's hoping more studios take a risk on whatever R-rated Marvel or DC properties whose rights they hold.

3. Ryan Reynolds
The former Green Lantern is generally considered talented, charming, and handsome, but he's never been a big box office draw. Most of his movies that opened well have done so with either Reynolds appearing in a rom-com, or playing second or third banana to a bigger star.

His biggest opening to date in a movie he carried himself was "Green Lantern," which enjoyed a so-so $53.2 million debut on its way to becoming one of the biggest flops in recent memory (the 2011 film cost a reported $200 million and earned back just $116.6 million in North America). So it's no surprise that analysts were wary of how he'd fare carrying another superhero movie.

Still, Reynolds is golden when he finds a movie that suits his raised-eyebrow sense of humor. Audiences seem to know this, and they turned out to see Reynolds be Reynolds.

4. Strong Reviews
To attract the older audience it needs, it helps if an R-rated movie wins over the critics. "Deadpool" did, scoring an 82 percent rating at Rotten Tomatoes and 65 percent at Metacritic. "Deadpool" also earned an A from audiences at CinemaScore, indicating very strong word-of-mouth recommendations from viewers, both men and women.

5. Weak Competition
This weekend's other two new wide releases, "How to Be Single" and "Zoolander No. 2," were both supposed to open around $20 million. Yet "Single" pulled in just an estimated $18.8 million, while "Zoolander" picked up just an estimated $15.7 million -- slightly more than the original film opened with 15 years ago. Reviews for "Single" were middling, while those for "Zoolander" were scathingly awful. Advantage: "Deadpool."

6. Valentine's Day Falling on a Sunday
That's an accident of timing that's easily overlooked. But if it had fallen on a Friday, the romantic comedy "Single" would have made for a stronger date movie than it did with Valentine's Day coming at the end of the weekend. That also helped "Deadpool," which didn't have to worry about losing the couples audience on Friday night.

7. Fox's On-point Marketing
Fox seems to have been teasing this movie for at least a year, with red-band trailers that played up the movie's humor, violence, and raunch. The message -- this is not your grandmother's superhero movie, unless your grandmother is Betty White -- came through loud and clear. Of course, the saturation marketing wouldn't have worked so well if critics and audiences didn't feel that "Deadpool" delivered on the hype.

Oscars 2016: How to Pick Best Picture and Win Your Oscar Pool

$
0
0
When it comes to predicting a Best Picture Oscar winner, should we believe the numbers, or should we believe the buzz?

That's the question this week after "The Revenant" swept the BAFTAs, the British Academy Awards. The frontier drama certainly has the buzz. The momentum is on its side, not just from its five prizes picked up in London -- including Best Film, Best Director, Best Actor (near-lock Oscar hopeful Leonardo DiCaprio), Best Cinematography, and Best Sound -- but also from Alejandro González Iñárritu's historic win a week earlier at the Directors Guild Awards, when the "Revenant" and "Birdman" filmmaker became the first person ever to win two DGA prizes in a row.

But the stats that usually serve as reliable barometers of Academy sentiment? They tend to tell a different story.
"Spotlight" is still in the race because it won Best Ensemble at the Screen Actors Guild awards; "The Revenant" wasn't even nominated for that prize, the equivalent of Best Picture, by the group whose members make up the largest branch of the Academy. "Spotlight" also won Best Original Screenplay this past weekend at the Writers Guild of America awards and at the BAFTAs.

And then there's "Revenant's" biggest rival, "The Big Short." It won the American Cinema Editors' ACE Eddie Award. Last weekend, it also won the Best Adapted Screenplay prize from the BAFTAs and the WGA, a feat it's likely to duplicate at the Oscars. "Revenant" isn't even nominated for screenplay, perhaps under the mistaken notion that it's not that big a challenge to write a screenplay that has minimal dialogue. Still, how can a movie win an Academy Award for Best Picture if it's not even a contender for Best Screenplay? That almost never happens, although one of the few times it did was DiCaprio's "Titanic."

The biggest asset "Big Short" has going into the Oscars is its PGA victory. In the award's 25-year history, it's predicted the Best Picture Oscar winner 19 times. In the six years since the PGA adopted a preferential ballot like the Academy's, it's anticipated the Academy victor all six times.
In the statistics-based reckoning, the BAFTAs usually don't figure at all. (The Hollywood-based Academy may love British actors and British movies, but do its voters really care what British film professionals choose as their favorites?) The American Academy has agreed with the British one on Best Film only 26 out of 68 times. In the recent past -- in the years since the BAFTAs moved their ceremony to precede the Oscars -- the BAFTAs anticipated the Oscar winner for Best Picture eight out of 15 times. The Brits have called six of the last seven Best Picture Oscar contests correctly; the only one they got wrong was last year's when they picked "Boyhood" over "Birdman." It's not out of the realm of possibility that the BAFTAs honored "Revenant" and Iñárritu this year to make up for last year's snub.

Still, there are some numbers in favor of "Revenant." It has the most Oscar nominations (12), which suggests not only a possible sweep but also enough good will across the Academy's various branches to earn a Best Picture win. And the DGA winner has also won Best Picture 53 out of 67 times.

No director has ever seen two of his movies win Best Picture in a row. But if the momentum for "Revenant" is really that strong, Iñárritu could become the first to reach that milestone. Statistics, after all, aren't ironclad rules, just prediction tools. They're accurate and valid... until they're not.
Sure, "Big Short" has the all-important PGA victory. But it doesn't have momentum, having lost big at the SAGs, the DGA, and BAFTAs (where it picked up only the writing prize out of its five nominations). "Spotlight" won at the SAGs, but that was three weeks ago. Since then, it's won the two writing awards, but otherwise, not much momentum there, either.

And there are other strikes against "Big Short" and "Spotlight." Comedies seldom win, even smart, satirical black comedies like "Big Short." Movies without nominated lead performances seldom win, which is another advantage "Revenant" has over its rivals. Finally, there's the foregone-conclusion argument: if the rank-and-file of Hollywood had liked "Big Short" or "Spotlight" more, they would have won more guild prizes and earned more Oscar nominations than they did -- and they'd have buzz as well as numbers on their side. We could still get a Best Picture/Best Director split, like we got twice in the past three years.
Iñárritu now seems a lock for Best Director, but there's still a chance that "Big Short" or (less likely) "Spotlight" might win Best Picture. It's just a matter of whether the strong statistics in those movies' favor are stronger than the wave of awards love that "Revenant" is currently riding.

One refreshing thing about this year's Best Picture race, aside from how unpredictable it's been, is how little mudslinging there's been. All three of these films are based on historical events, but there's been little grumbling about gross distortions of fact or smeared reputations of real people. That's not to say these movies are scrupulously accurate (they all have taken dramatic liberties), but rather, the focus has been almost entirely on how well each one works -- or doesn't work -- as a movie.

Academy voting ends next week, on Feb. 23. If the voters choose to be influenced by either the buzz or the weight of history, so be it. But at least no one's loudly trying to sway them based on nasty whispers.

Why 'Deadpool' Is Unstoppable at the Box Office

$
0
0
No one expects much to happen at the box office in February. And that's how we get a surprise smash like "Deadpool."

The saga of the pan-sexual superhero, which broke all kinds of box office records when it premiered last weekend, had a 58 percent drop this weekend (on par with most comic book movies) and still easily topped the box office with an estimated $55 million. In 10 days, "Deadpool" has racked up $235.4 million to become the highest grossing movie from the "X-Men" universe. It's also the fastest R-rated movie to $200 million (nine days) and well on its way to being the highest-grossing R-rated title ever. These figures are even more impressive considering that none of those tickets had 3D surcharges.

"Kung Fu Panda 3" is displaying strong holding power as well. In its fourth weekend, the threequel finished in second place with an estimated $12.5 million. It's earned $117.1 million to date, in no small part because of smart timing on the part of distributor 20th Century Fox -- aside from "Star Wars: The Force Awakens," it's the only family-friendly film currently in wide release. Fox also has the top two movies this weekend.

How are other films supposed to compete with these two that have staked out so much turf at the multiplex? Well, there are other niches to be served, and this weekend's three new wide releases each experiment with a novel approach to reaching them.
"Risen," which opened in third, is unusual for a Christian-themed movie. It has a clever premise -- it's a police procedural set in biblical Jerusalem, about a Roman officer charged with finding the body of Jesus after the crucifixion, a task complicated by the corpse's rumored resurrection. It has a fairly sizable budget by Christian movie standards (a reported $20 million). It's earned middling reviews from critics that are still better than the usually dismissive reviews that such films usually receive.

Finally, it has a major distributor behind it (Sony), which gave it a very wide release (2,915 screens) and which seems to have marketed it smartly enough to cross over beyond the Christian-movie audience to general viewers. (Getting a PG-13 rating was a good move, one that would indicate to weekend thriller-goers that "Risen" actually has some grit.) As a result, "Risen" opened slightly better than predicted, with an estimated $11.8 million. Word-of-mouth is very good, as measured by an A- grade at CinemaScore. It should hold up well over Lent, even though there will be other movies targeting the same audience, since "Risen" was first out of the gate.

"The Witch" also enjoyed success, more than some may have expected since it is a period horror movie about Puritans in the witch-trial era. The film's creepy take on the material, and meticulous attention to historical detail, helped it win big among the film buffs at Sundance last year. Critics raved too, giving the movie an 88 at Rotten Tomatoes.
All that acclaim is unusual for a horror film, and it led indie distributor A24 to go all out with its first big wide release for "The Witch." Opening on 2,045 screens, "Witch" earned an estimated $8.7 million, good for fourth place. It also had the best per-screen average ($4,245) of any new wide release this weekend. Paradoxically, "Witch" didn't impress ticketbuyers nearly as much as it did the critics; it earned a poor grade (C-) at CinemaScore. Guess the chilly atmospherics that impressed the reviewers didn't do much for a horror audience that prefers frequent jolts and gore.

Still, as experiments in thinking outside the box office box, "Risen" and "Witch" fared better than "Race."

The Jesse Owens biopic/sports drama seemed well-timed for Black History Month. Indeed, those who did buy tickets seemed to find it inspirational, giving it an A at CinemaScore. But they had to be drawn to the theater first, and that's where the Olympic runner's story stumbled.

"Race" was widely expected to open in fourth place at around $9 million. But it didn't even crack the top five. It opened instead in sixth place with an estimated $7.3 million. Whether the very good word-of-mouth "Race" earned will be enough to overcome its weak opening, the coming weeks will tell.

Nonetheless, at least the studios are trying something different. If only they would do that year round.

Oscars 2016 Preview: 13 Things You'll See at This Year's Academy Awards

$
0
0
It's fitting that this year's Academy Award-nominated movies are largely about daunting survival challenges -- like "The Revenant" and "The Martian" -- since sitting through the ceremony can be something of an ordeal, even if you're at home and in easy reach of microwave popcorn.

To prepare yourself for what could be four hours of Oscar-watching (not to mention two hours of red carpet arrivals), it helps to know what to expect. Here's what to watch for at the 88th Academy Awards show, airing on ABC on Feb. 28.

'Pretty in Pink': 15 Things You (Probably) Didn't Know About the John Hughes Classic

$
0
0
Sportsphoto/AllstarThirty years have passed since the release of "Pretty in Pink" (on February 28, 1986), and yet we're still bewildered by the teen romance's climax.

Maybe we need to think of the John Hughes-scripted film as Gen X's own "Casablanca." The ending makes more sense if you think of Duckie (Jon Cryer) as Humphrey Bogart, letting the woman he loves (Molly Ringwald's Andie) go off with the dull-but-decent guy (Andrew McCarthy's Blane) because he's finally admitted to himself that he's a chivalrous romantic who values her happiness above his own. Yeah, it's a stretch, but it's just one of many interpretations to spin out of this Hughes classic.

In honor of the film turning the big three-0, here are 15 surprising facts about the best movie ever named after a Psychedelic Furs song.
1. Hughes wrote the role of Andie Walsh for Ringwald, but even though she'd starred in his hits "Sixteen Candles" and "The Breakfast Club," Paramount initially wanted someone the studio perceived as a bigger star: Jennifer Beals. Fortunately for posterity, Beals said no.

2. Before he made his feature directing debut on "Pink," Howard Deutch was best known for directing music videos for such stars as Billy Idol and Billy Joel.
3. Hughes and Deutch almost chose the then-little-known Charlie Sheen to play Blane. But Ringwald told them she preferred McCarthy, saying, "That's the kind of guy I would fall in love with." Sheen, of course, ended up with a small but key role that same year in Hughes' "Ferris Bueller's Day Off."

4. The filmmakers wanted Anthony Michael Hall for Duckie, but he'd done four John Hughes films in two years -- two of them with Ringwald -- and didn't want to repeat himself. Fisher Stevens auditioned for Duckie as well before the producers hired Jon Cryer.
5. Cryer (pictured left) was not Ringwald's ideal Duckie. She wanted Robert Downey Jr., then a little-known actor who'd played one of the bullies in Hughes' "Weird Science." She felt she had more romantic chemistry with him than with Cryer. In fact, she even suggested, a few years ago, that Cryer's Duckie might secretly be closeted, and that if the movie were made now, he'd be the gay best friend instead of the romantic rival. Ringwald finally got to romance Downey in 1987, when they co-starred in "The Pick-Up Artist."

6. Cryer didn't get along well with Ringwald or McCarthy during the shoot. "I think they were irritated by me from day one," he said last year. As for the gay-best-friend vibe he gave off, Cryer has said he understands. He often calls himself "an effeminate heterosexual dork" in interviews. Even his wife, entertainment reporter Lisa Joyner, has said she thought Cryer was gay when they first became friends.
7. James Spader proved he deserved the part of Steff by behaving obnoxiously at the audition. He arrived smoking a cigarette and stubbed it out on the floor. During the shoot, however, Cryer remembered him as "perfectly friendly and lovely to work with."

8. Anjelica Huston and Tracey Ullman were both up for the role of record-store manager Iona. Huston turned the role down, while Ullman had yet to master the flat Midwestern American accent.
9. Hughes ultimately chose Annie Potts to play Iona because he liked her performance in "Ghostbusters."

10. Duckie's record-store dance, where he lip-syncs to Otis Redding's "Try a Little Tenderness," wasn't in the script. During his audition, Cryer had done a similar routine, performing both Michael Jackson's and Mick Jagger's parts in "State of Shock." Deutch wanted to have Cryer move like Jagger to the tune of the Rolling Stones' "Start Me Up," but the filmmakers couldn't get the rights. Deutch ultimately picked the Redding chestnut and hired no less than choreographer Kenny Ortega ("Dirty Dancing") to plot Cryer's dance steps.11. As most "Pink" fans know, the film originally ended with Andie and Duckie getting together, but test audiences rejected that ending, so McCarthy had to return well after the film wrapped to shoot an Andie-and-Blane ending.

12. But what fans may not know is why McCarthy looks so different in the sequence. Turns out he'd gone on to act in a play, "The Boys of Winter," for which he had shaved his head, so for the reshoot, he had to wear a wig. He'd also lost a lot of weight for the play and is noticeably more gaunt than in the rest of the film.

13. The initial ending had been scored to Orchestral Manoeuvers in the Dark's "Goddess of Love," but the new ending required a new song. When OMD received the request for a new track, the band was just two days away from going on tour. In 24 hours, the band wrote and recorded the swoony "If You Leave," which made the sequence and became OMD's biggest hit.14. Other now-classic songs composed for the movie include Suzanne Vega's "Left of Center," New Order's "Shellshock," and Echo and the Bunnymen's "Bring on the Dancing Horses."

15. "Pretty in Pink" cost a reported $9 million to make. It earned back $40.5 million in North America.

Oscars 2016: 5 Lessons From This Year's Crazy Race

$
0
0
The ballots are in and on Sunday, the Oscars will (finally) be handed out.

This year's race has been full of "The Revenant" this and "Spotlight" that. Thankfully, it all comes to an end this weekend -- and us movie-fans could use the rest.

But before the stars and filmmakers stroll down the red carpet, here are five big takeaways from one of the most interesting -- and unpredictable -- Oscars ever.

1. It Ain't Over 'til it's Over
Voting may have ended on Tuesday, Feb. 23, but groups will keep handing out precursor awards -- the Costume Designers Guild, the Motion Picture Sound Editors, the Independent Spirits, even the Razzies -- all handed out after it's too late for them to influence the Oscar balloting. There's a nice irony in the notion that Eddie Redmayne is more likely to win a Razzie on Saturday for "Jupiter Ascending" than he is to win an Oscar on Sunday for "The Danish Girl," but it's not like the Academy is going to hold his performance in the former movie against him when voting on Best Actor; indeed, there's no evidence that Academy members pay any attention at all to the Razzie nominations while voting.

Similarly, there used to be a lot of overlap between the Independent Spirits and the Oscars, especially 10 to 20 years ago, when the major studios had all but abandoned the prestige picture business and let independent distributors dominate the Academy Awards. These days, however, there's a more balanced mix of studio and indie productions at the Oscars, and while Brie Larson ("Room") is just as likely to win Best Actress on Saturday night at the Spirits' beachside ceremony in Santa Monica as she is Sunday at Hollywood's Dolby Theatre, there are very few other nominees in common this year, much less likely winners.

Nonetheless, it's possible that, while filling out their Oscar ballots over the past couple weeks, some voters had the nominees for these late awards in the back of their minds, maybe even enough voters to affect the outcome in some categories. We won't know for certain until the envelopes open Sunday night. Which leads to the next point...

2. Nobody Knows Anything
That's the famous line about Hollywood attributed to screenwriter William Goldman. It's true about Oscar forecasts as well.

This year's race has been especially unpredictable, which analysts have found either fun or frustrating. (I'd like to think I've been in the "fun" camp, but I'll let my readers be the judge.) Put it this way, it's still a three-way melee for Best Picture. While most pundits think "The Revenant" will sweep, there are still some who argue, with valid reasoning, that "The Big Short" will pull it off, or that "Spotlight" (the most old-fashioned, traditional prestige picture of the bunch) still has a good shot. My predictions are now a matter of public record, but if "Big Short" beats "Revenant," if Mark Rylance ("Bridge of Spies") upsets Sylvester Stallone ("Creed") for Best Supporting Actor, or if Kate Winslet ("Steve Jobs") defeats Alicia Vikander ("The Danish Girl") for Supporting Actress, I won't be that surprised.

3. Box Office Hasn't Been That Big of a Factor
"Revenant" is a big hit ($166 million earned to date in North America), but not as big as "The Martian" ($228 million) and only slightly ahead of "Mad Max: Fury Road" ($154 million). Besides "Revenant," Best Picture front-runners "The Big Short" and "Spotlight" have earned $67 million and $38 million, respectively.

The lowest-grossing Best Picture nominee is "Room" ($13 million), which will not stop Brie Larson from winning Best Actress. The point is, there's no "Titanic" or "The Lord of the Rings"-sized blockbuster that demands attention simply for being too big to ignore, and there's no scrappy "The Hurt Locker"-sized indie that will win based on its underdog backstory. There's also no movie that stands to reap millions at the box office from an Oscar victory. Aside from "Revenant" and "Big Short," which opened fairly late in the year, most of this year's Oscar movies are either near the end of their theatrical lives or are already out on video. (The movies that were still playing when they were nominated in mid-January were able to reap the benefits then, but actually winning won't matter much now.)

The studios behind the Oscar-nominated movies may have invested heavily in their awards campaigns, but the amount of business the movies actually did, or may yet do, doesn't seem to have swayed the Academy.

4. The Academy Should Be Proud of This Film Slate
Yes, there have been complaints about snubs; and, of course, #OscarsSoWhite. But among the eight Best Picture candidates, there's really not one that you can say doesn't deserve to be there.

It would have been nice if they'd nominated a full slate of 10 and made room for such overlooked films as "Creed," "Ex Machina," or "Straight Outta Compton," but at least such gripes mean that 2015 was such a good year for movies that the Academy simply couldn't recognize them all. The ones they did pick, as noted above, are a healthy mix of art-house standouts that aren't off-puttingly highbrow and mass-appeal hits that are intelligent and substantive -- exactly the sort of populist-but-critically-acclaimed slate the Academy has been shooting for since it expanded the category in 2009 from five slots to as many as 10.

In the short term, that list, plus the suspense of an unpredictable race, ought to draw viewers to Sunday night's awards ceremony. In the long term, it should result in a top prize winner that, 10 or 20 years from now, won't make movie fans wonder, "What we're they thinking?"

5. The Diversity Issue Isn't Going Away
Think about this: More black performers were nominated in 1940 (the year Hattie McDaniel won for "Gone With the Wind") than in the last two years.

The last time Chris Rock hosted the Oscars, in 2005, there were six nominations for actors of color and two wins. One reason the #OscarsSoWhite protests have been so vocal is that the Academy actually used to do a much better job of recognizing achievement among all performers, not just the white ones. The Academy has been trying in recent years to diversify its membership, and its effort since the public relations debacle of this year's nominations to make the Academy younger have run into some backlash, as well. Especially among older members who don't want to be thrown under the bus just because they haven't racked up film credits in a while. Their argument is the same as that of the protesters: that every perspective has value. They just disagree on how to make the voting more inclusive.

It's been a worthwhile discussion to have, since it's prompted Hollywood to acknowledge that the problem's origins lie not with the Academy but with the entire industry, and that changes have to be made behind the cameras before the results will be apparent at the Dolby Theatre.

Final Predictions for the 2016 Oscars

$
0
0
For once, we have an Oscar race with some actual suspense.

Last year, "Boyhood" and "Birdman" went neck-and-neck for most of awards season, but by the home stretch, the results were easy to predict if you were paying attention. This year, with three strong contenders for Best Picture, guessing who'll go home with trophies on Sunday is that much harder.

Nonetheless, most of the acting categories, as well as a few others, have been pretty much locked down for months. Here, then, are my picks for who'll triumph at the 88th Academy Awards, based on research, many years spent covering the Oscars, and my gut feelings.

1. Best Original Song
Could this be the year that perennial Oscar also-ran Diane Warren finally wins? After all, she's teamed with Lady Gaga, who's been on a roll lately, in creating the tune "Til It Happens To You," from "The Hunting Ground." Warren's strongest competitors are Sam Smith's "Spectre" theme "Writing's on the Wall" and The Weeknd's "Earned It" (from "Fifty Shades of Grey"), which just won him a Grammy. But that's probably not enough cover for the Academy to risk letting "Fifty Shades" go down in history as an Oscar-winning film. Smith's James Bond theme is as divisive as its movie. And the other two nominated songs are reportedly not being performed during the show, an indication that they're very long shots. So that means the eighth time will finally be the charm for Warren.

2. Best Original Score
Legendary Italian composer Ennio Morricone has been nominated for six Oscars, but has yet to win one in competition. (He won an honorary Oscar in 2007.) His work on Tarantino's "The Hateful Eight" could finally right that wrong. Besides, the Academy will find it hard to resist the sentimental drama of the 87-year-old finally winning one the old-fashioned way.

3. Best Sound Editing
Typically, this award, which is for sound effects, goes to the loudest film. That's probably "Mad Max: Fury Road."

4. Best Sound Mixing
This prize honors a movie's overall soundscape. This should go to the team from "The Revenant," not just for their expert recreation of the sounds of the primeval wilderness, but also for the overall Academy love for the movie's technical achievements.

5. Best Visual Effects
This could be one of the voters' only chances to reward "Star Wars: The Force Awakens." But voters may be more impressed by the effects from "Mad Max: Fury Road," created the old-school way, without (as much) digital trickery.

6. Best Makeup and Hairstyling
"The Revenant" has a shot for turning Leonardo DiCaprio into a grizzled mountain man, but the "Mad Max" makeup team had to make a huge cast look creatively freakish, not just one star who's on-screen solo for much of the movie.

7. Best Costume Design
Before this contest, Sandy Powell had been nominated for this award 10 times and won three. She's competing against herself this year with nominations for both "Carol" and "Cinderella." (The other real contender is Jenny Beavan, for the inventively hideous outfits in "Fury Road.") As impeccable and sleek as Powell's costumes are for the 1950s period romance, the Academy likes lavish costumes, so expect Powell to win for the Disney ballroom fantasy.

8. Best Foreign Language Film
It's a horrible cliché, but the movie about the Holocaust tends to win. This year, that's Hungary's "Son of Saul."

9. Best Live-Action Short
All the nominees this year are festival prize-winners with similar themes of the difficulties of cross-cultural communication. Consensus seems to favor "Ave Maria," an international co-production about a noisy family of observant Jews trapped in a convent full of silent nuns. It's the most laugh-out-loud of the nominees; apparently, the Academy isn't so snobby about comedy when the movies are brief. Otherwise, the front-runner would be the more somber "Day One," about an Army translator's unbelievably hectic first day on the job in Afghanistan.

10. Best Documentary Short
"Body Team 12" is a timely, triumph-of-the-human-spirit account of Red Cross volunteers who collected the remains of Ebola victims during the recent outbreak in Liberia. It's been the favorite ever since it won the Documentary Short prize at the Tribeca Film Festival last spring.

11. Best Documentary Feature
"Amy," the doc about the tragic life of singer Amy Winehouse, has been such a critical and commercial success that, for months, it's been the film to beat. Though "What Happened, Miss Simone?" is hot on its heels.

12. Best Animated Short
"Sanjay's Super Team" Comes to the Con — Director Sanjay Patel and producer Nicole Grindle are taking Pixar Animation Studios' new short to San Diego's Comic-Con International next month for its North American premiere and a peek behind the scenes of the production process. The Super Story Behind the Pixar Short "Sanjay's Super Team," slated for Thurs., July 9 at 11 a.m. in the Indigo Ballroom, Hilton Bayfront, reveals the unique inspiration for this incredibly personal film that features superheroes like never before. The short debuts in U.S. theaters in front of Disney-Pixar's "The Good Dinosaur" on Nov. 25, 2015.As with the feature length cartoons, Disney and Pixar tend to win, so the obvious favorite is "Sanjay's Super Team." But "World of Tomorrow" is so devastatingly great that it ought to win on sheer merit. Besides, not everyone liked "Sanjay."

13. Best Animated Feature
"Inside Out" has had the inside track on the prize since it opened last June. Yes, "Anomalisa" is just as imaginative, but Pixar owns the home-field advantage in this category.

14. Best Production Design
Three of the five contenders just won prizes at the Art Directors Guild awards. The award for contemporary design went to "The Martian," for its impressively realistic space station, while the award for period design went to "The Revenant," whose designer, Jack Fisk, has a distinguished 45-year-career but has yet to win an Oscar. Nonetheless, it's unlikely that the Academy will reward him this time for a movie that's set largely in an unspoiled wilderness. So that means the Oscar should go to the ADG fantasy winner, the imaginative sets for the post-apocalyptic nightmare of "Mad Max."

15. Best Cinematography
Poor Roger Deakins. The "Sicario" cinematographer is one of the great film artists of our time, and yet he's 0 for 12 at the Oscars. Not only is he going to lose again this year, but he's going to lose to the same man who beat him last year and the year before. It's unprecedented for someone to win this prize three times in a row, but "Revenant" cinematographer Emmanuel "Chivo" Lubezki is going to do it.

16. Best Editing
For the sheer, headlong pace of it, the award should go to editor Margaret Sixel for "Fury Road." Besides, it won the American Cinema Editors' Eddie award -- a strong predictor of Oscar gold.

17. Best Adapted Screenplay
Adam McKay and Charles Randolph should easily win for "The Big Short," their deft adaptation of Michael Lewis' book about the 2008 financial collapse. Not only is it the only nominee that's based on a non-fiction book (and is therefore about a weighty historical topic), but it also managed to explain the complicated crisis in an easy-to-understand, humorous, outrageously entertaining way. Plus, it won the Writers Guild award. Its biggest rival is Emma Donoghue's adaptation of her own novel, "Room." Sad but true: no woman has ever won an Oscar for adapting her own source material.

18. Best Original Screenplay
"Spotlight" has the advantage. The meticulous research, serious historical subject matter, and acting showcases for a vast ensemble have made it the leading contender. Also, it won the Writers Guild prize. And it may be the only chance Academy voters will get to reward the picture that was once the Best Picture front-runner. "Inside Out" is its closest competitor, but no animated film has ever won this prize.

19. Best Supporting Actress
This is the only acting category that's still a toss-up. Kate Winslet won the Golden Globe and British Academy (BAFTA) prizes for "Steve Jobs," a movie you might not have noticed she was in. Right now, the race is between her and Alicia Vikander ("The Danish Girl") , who won the more important precursor award from the Screen Actors Guild. Plus, this was a breakthrough year for her (six movies!), and honoring her performance here also means recognizing her for her lead role in "Ex Machina" -- and for surviving unscathed the debacle that was "The Man From U.N.C.L.E."

20. Best Supporting Actor
The sentimental favorite here is Sylvester Stallone, nominated 39 years ago for creating Rocky Balboa, and nominated again this year for playing the boxer in twilight in "Creed." Again, the sentimental vote factors in here, as it's hard to resist the emotional appeal of handing the 69-year-old Stallone his first acting Oscar.

21. Best Actress
Brie Larson's had this one locked up pretty much since "Room" started playing festivals last fall. As the captive mother fiercely protecting her unworldly son, and making a world for him inside a tiny cell, she both inspired and broke the hearts of pretty much everyone who's seen the movie.

22. Best Actor
This one has been Leo's to lose even before "The Revenant" opened. Maybe you're tired of hearing about all the hardships he endured during the shoot (he ate raw bison liver!), but even if you don't admire the effort, it's hard to argue with the results. More important, he's been nominated six times in 22 years but has yet to win. The whole town thinks he's due. So, DiCaprio will win this contest, as he has every prize he's been eligible for this winter.

23. Best Director
It's very rare for a director to win back-to-back Oscars. Only two men have done it, and the last was 65 years ago. Still, Alejandro González Iñárritu pulled off the unprecedented feat of winning the Directors Guild Award twice in a row; that achievement alone makes him the man to beat. Iñárritu's only real rival is "Mad Max: Fury Road" director George Miller, whose triumphant accomplishment in seeing his vision realized is just as impressive, and who, at age 70, has yet to win an Oscar despite a distinguished career. But sentiment can't overcome Iñárritu's momentum and the Academy's widespread "Revenant" love.

24. Best Picture
This is the toughest call this year, the category that's made the race so unpredictable and exciting for months. (Remember last fall, when "The Martian" and "Mad Max" were the favorites? Good times.)

At first, it looked like "Spotlight," with its prestige cast and subject matter, and Screen Actors Guild prize for Best Ensemble. But then "The Big Short" won the Producers Guild Award, the only major guild prize that uses a preferential ballot like the Academy's Best Picture category does, and the accurate predictor of the Academy vote for the last eight years. And then there's "The Revenant," which has earned a ton of money, grabbed the most Oscar nominations (12), and has momentum, with recent wins at the Directors Guild, Art Directors Guild, and BAFTAs. It's possible there'll be a split between the Directing and Picture categories, as there was in 2013 and 2014, but it doesn't happen that often. That, plus the Academy's bias against comedy and the film's low nominations tally (five), suggests that "Big Short" will get shorted.

The love for "Revenant" may not be deep, but it's broad, and it's consensus choices that win on the preferential ballot. If nothing else, "Revenant" feels like a grand achievement, something Oscar voters will feel good about having voted for years from now.

7 Reasons Why 'Gods of Egypt' Was an Epic Box Office Flop

$
0
0
Forget "13 Hours." With "Gods of Egypt," 2016 has its first bonafide megaflop.

That may seem a harsh way to describe a movie that opened near the high end of predictions, with an estimated $14.0 million, placing second only to the still-unstoppable "Deadpool." But remember, "Gods" cost a reported $140 million to make and was supposed to launch the next big fantasy franchise for Lionsgate, the studio behind the "Hunger Games" and "Divergent" films. This weekend's figures make the prospect of lucrative sequels very doubtful, especially since the movie looks like it's going to struggle to earn back even a fourth of its budget in American multiplexes.

In retrospect, it's hard to figure why the studio gambled so much on this film, given all the strikes against it that are apparent now. For instance:

1. The CastingGerald Butler and Nikolaj Coster-Waldau are not big box office draws, no matter how much you loved "300" or "Game of Thrones." Actually, Butler does well in the right circumstances, which is why there are higher hopes for his "London Has Fallen" action sequel, opening next weekend.

It's possible that there are Butler fans who didn't want to blow their money on the unknown-quantity "Gods" because they're saving it for the actor's more familiar franchise next week. But just because he excelled in a swords-and-sandals epic a decade ago doesn't mean he should be the go-to guy for ancient-world action spectacles.

2. The Whitewash
This was the even bigger problem with the casting: that the main roles were almost entirely played by white actors. It's not just an #OscarsSoWhite thing; the time seems to have passed when you could get away with casting an Egyptian story with so few brown performers in it.

In 2014, Ridley Scott famously said he couldn't have financed his $140-million Egyptian epic, the biblical "Exodus: Gods and Kings," without a predominantly white cast. But having Christian Bale and box office non-entities like Joel Edgerton didn't help either. That movie opened with $24.1 million and topped out at $65.0 million in North America. You'd think the makers of "Gods of Egypt" would have learned from "Gods and Kings" and gone for historical accuracy over cynical pandering, but they didn't, and the result backfired. When the trailers for the new film came out last fall, the backlash was so loud that both director Alex Proyas and Lionsgate issued statements apologizing for the miscalculation. That bad press might not have kept moviegoers away this weekend, but it didn't help.

3. The Testosterone
How did Lionsgate think this was going to be the next "Hunger Games" or "Divergent?" Two things those franchises had in common: they were based on best-selling book series, and they had likable teenage-girl heroines. "Gods" has no literary pedigree and is pretty much a sausage fest.

4. The Filmmakers
Alex Proyas used to be considered a truly visionary director, thanks to cult hits "The Crow" and "Dark City" (pictured). More recently, he's made big, corporate action/sci-fi movies like "I, Robot" and "Knowing." He's working here with the screenwriters behind (woof) "Dracula Untold" and "The Last Witch Hunter," both movies that critics and audiences alike rejected.

5. Really Bad Reviews
With a team like that, it's no wonder that "Gods of Egypt" received such dismal reviews (13 percent fresh at Rotten Tomatoes, 24 at Metacritic). But even audiences gave it poor word-of-mouth, judging by the film's B- grade at CinemaScore.

6. The Videogame-y Visual Effects
No doubt Lionsgate was hoping that the movie's 3D bookings would bring in more money, but by many accounts, "Gods"' visuals weren't that impressive -- with creatures and sets that would have been more at home in a video game than on the giant screen. American audiences have shown that they're not willing to pay extra for 3D unless the movie offers a real treat for the eye.

7. The Timing
LHF_DAY_20_CR_0154.NEFNot only was positioning the movie a week before Butler's "London Has Fallen" (above) a bad idea, but so was putting it in the sights of "Deadpool," which earned another estimated $31.5 million this weekend. In fairness, everyone underestimated "Deadpool." Still, when action/fantasy fans have a choice between a contemporary Marvel superhero movie and an unfamiliar adventure set in the ancient world, it's not hard to guess which one they'll pick.

It's not all bad news for "Gods of Egypt." The movie has already earned an estimated $38.2 million overseas, which isn't earth-shattering, but that total is nearly three times what it earned here. Foreign moviegoers have certainly shown themselves to be less picky than homegrown audiences about the quality of their action movies, non-diverse casting, and ho-hum 3D.

Still, after you take away marketing costs and the share of revenue that goes to the theaters, "Gods" will have to earn about $305 million overseas just to break even. Anyone who thinks that'll happen is living on de banks of de Nile.

Oscars 2016 Recap: The 15 Best and Worst Moments

$
0
0
The elephant in the room? Consider it addressed.

From the moment emcee Chris Rock first appeared in his white dinner jacket to the closing-credits playing out under Public Enemy's "Fight the Power," the 88th Academy Awards missed no opportunity to acknowledge the Academy's disastrous PR stemming from a second straight year without any acting nominees of color. The jokes and apologies referencing the #OscarsSoWhite controversy were so numerous that they distracted from the fact that there were 24 awards to hand out, many of them to surprised and emotional winners. As a result, like many of this year's nominated films, the 3 1/2-hour Oscar telecast was as much about endurance as entertainment. Still, there were some moments that, for good or ill, viewers won't soon forget.88th Annual Academy Awards - Backstage And Audience

21 Unlikely Voice Actors You've Heard in Disney Animated Movies

$
0
0
Family-friendly studio Disney has a history, going back 60-plus years, of casting performers from the world of grown-up entertainment in its animated hits. In fact, Disney and Pixar's classics are full of unlikely voice actors.

The cast of "Zootopia" (in theaters Friday, March 4th) joins a distinguished list of stars -- some you'd expect, and some you wouldn't -- who've lent their voices to Disney animated features, as you can see in the gallery above.unlikely disney voice actors

16 TV Shows and Movies to Fill the 'Downton Abbey' Void After the Finale

$
0
0
How are we going to get by without "Downton Abbey"? After the series finale airs on PBS on Sunday, March 6, how will we get along without regular doses of Mr. Carson glowering, Mr. Barrow skulking, Lord Grantham losing money, Lady Mary looking flapper-fabulous, Daisy being adorably feisty, Lady Edith being miserable, Mrs. Patmore whipping up a banquet, and the Dowager Countess dropping waspish witticisms full of worldly wisdom?

We'll have to make do with the next best thing -- these costume-drama TV series and movies, many of them available for streaming, that feature "Downton" stars or "Downton"-like settings and themes.

'The Birdcage': 11 Things You (Probably) Don't Know About the Robin Williams Hit

$
0
0
At times, while directing Robin Williams and Nathan Lane in "The Birdcage," Mike Nichols found himself laughing so hard that he had to work from beneath a soundproof blanket in order not to ruin the takes. Can you blame him?

Twenty years after its release on March 8, 1996, "The Birdcage" remains a hilarious landmark. Besides being a smash hit, the film made a movie star out of Lane, gave Calista Flockhart her big break, and provided probably the only opportunity in film history to see Gene Hackman in a platinum blonde wig and a gown. Still, as many times as you've watched it on cable over the past two decades, there's still much you may not now about the beloved drag comedy. Here are the secrets "The Birdcage" has tucked away.
1. "Birdcage" was already the seventh incarnation of the story, which started out as the French play "La Cage aux Folles" in 1973. It became a celebrated international film hit in 1978, spawned two movie sequels, a failed American TV pilot (called "Adam and Yves"), and then a hit Broadway musical in 1983. But Nichols' film was the first version to transplant the story to an American setting and insert topical political jokes.

2. The film marked a rare reunion between Mike Nichols and Elaine May, 35 years after they ended their pioneering sketch-comedy act at the height of its success. In the intervening years, May polished screenplays for such acclaimed films as "Reds" and "Tootsie." She stumbled notoriously as the director of 1987's "Ishtar." Nonetheless, when Nichols needed someone to adapt "La Cage" into a witty, Americanized, politically pointed screenplay, he turned to his old comedy partner. They'd reteam again two years later as director and writer, respectively, of the underrated political satire "Primary Colors."
3. Originally, the movie was to star Steve Martin (above) in the "straight" role of club owner Armand and Robin Williams as drag performer Albert. But when Martin dropped out of the project, Williams said he'd rather play Armand, feeling that, after "Mrs. Doubtfire," he wanted to play the subtler character.

4.The part of Albert went to Lane, then a top Broadway star whose biggest film role to date had been his voice work as meerkat Timon in "The Lion King." The two leads compared notes on the bonuses they earned for appearing in Disney animated blockbusters. Lane complained that, for Williams' role as the genie in "Aladdin," "he got a Picasso, and I got that painting with the six dogs playing poker."
5. The songs performed in the film are original or previously unheard songs by no less than Stephen Sondheim. The Broadway legend composed "Little Dream" (the song Albert sings in rehearsal) for the movie, and he gave the filmmakers two other songs cut from some of his acclaimed stage musicals. The song "Can That Boy Foxtrot," which Albert sings in the club, was a tune cut from Sondheim's "Follies." And "Love Is in the Air," sung by Armand and Katherine (Christine Baranski) in the latter's office, was the original opening number in "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum."

6. Wonder why that two-minute, all-in-one-take tracking shot that opens the film is so amazing? Maybe because the movie's cinematographer was Emmanuel "Chivo" Lubezki, the threepeat Oscar-winner behind "Gravity," "Birdman," and "The Revenant."
7. Playing a character who is supposed to be an 18-year-old college student, Flockhart was actually 30 at the time of filming. The exposure she earned from "The Birdcage" helped her land her star-making TV role on "Ally McBeal" a year later.

8. Playing a cameo as the club hostess is J. Roy Helland, who, besides crafting the hairstyles and make-up for "Birdcage" and other Nichols films, is also Meryl Streep's screen hairstylist. Helland is responsible for creating Streep's looks for nearly every movie the Oscar-winner has made since "Sophie's Choice."
9. The film cost a reported $31 million to make. It opened at No. 1 on the box office with $18.3 million, a record at the time for a movie with an openly gay protagonist. (That record stood for 13 years, until broken by "Bruno" in 2009.) "Bridcage" remained at No. 1 for four weeks and grossed a total of $124 million in North America -- and another $61 million overseas.

10. "Birdcage" earned one Oscar nomination, for its art direction. It lost to "The English Patient."

11. Now 83, May is enjoying a career resurgence. She's starring opposite Miley Cyrus in Woody Allen's upcoming streaming series on Amazon. And she returned to directing for the first time in three decades to film the recent episode of PBS' documentary series "American Masters" that's about the life and career of Nichols, who died in 2014.

How 'Zootopia' Conquered the Box Office

$
0
0
This was the weekend that adults came back to the multiplex. And, for the most part, what brought them back was a Disney movie about a city of talking animals.

"Zootopia," which opened at No. 1 with an estimated $73.7 million, broke a number of records. It was the largest three-day opening ever for the Walt Disney Animation Studios brand, beating "Frozen" (though that film's $67.4 million weekend was diluted a bit from having opened on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving). It's also the fourth-largest March opening weekend in history. Having opened abroad three weeks ago, "Zootopia" is also setting records in various South American and Asian countries; it's earned a total of $158.8 million overseas so far.

That the film opened so big in North America surprised no one. It had great reviews (98 percent fresh at Rotten Tomatoes) and great word-of-mouth (A grade CinemaScore). These factored into family audiences packing the multiplex this weekend, but it wasn't just families that came out to see it. According to Disney's exit polls, some 46 percent of the audience was over 25. Granted, a lot of them came with their kids. Still, a full 21 percent of the ticketbuyers were adults on their own.

Disney's been especially good at drawing adults to its cartoons over the past quarter century, ever since its animation renaissance began with 1989's "The Little Mermaid." For all its kid-friendly, furry adorableness, "Zootopia" seems even more squarely aimed at adults.

The movie's premise is essentially that of a mismatched-buddy-cop comedy, only with sleuth partners who happen to be a rabbit and a fox. Much of the humor comes from animal-themed parodies of the frustrations of adult life, like the slow-moving sloths who run the DMV. And the film is rated PG, which suggests that there may be some material in it that's not perfectly kid-friendly.
Disney also smartly marketed the movie to grown-ups, by attaching trailers to "Star Wars: The Force Awakens." It created a series of posters that were parodies of some of 2015's more grown-up films, including "Straight Outta Compton" and "Mad Max: Fury Road." It also cast Shakira as a slinky pop singer and had her create a typically hip-swiveling song for the film.

"Zootopia" was especially fortunate, however, in its timing. Besides having the family market to itself, the film was fortunate enough to open opposite some fairly weak adult competition. "London Has Fallen," sequel to the sleeper hit "Olympus Has Fallen," could have been a contender, but critics found it a disappointment (just 25 percent fresh at Rotten Tomatoes), and poor reviews likely kept the older audience away. As a result, the movie opened in second place with an estimated $21.7 million, well below the $30.4 million debut of "Olympus" two years ago.

TIna Fey's war comedy "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot" was also supposed to attract a grown-up audience. But Fey's not a proven box office draw outside her usual wheelhouse (broad farce), and "WTF" is a semi-serious satire based on recent real-life wartime events. Mixed reviews (60 percent at Rotten Tomatoes) didn't help. Predicted to open between $10 and $12 million, "WTF" premiered instead with a fourth-place finish of $7.6 million.
And then there's "Deadpool." After three weeks on top of the chart, "Zootopia" ended its reign, knocking the superhero adventure to third place with an estimated $16.4 million. (Don't weep for Wade Wilson; the mouthy Marvel hero has earned $311.2 million to date.) Now, maybe there's not a lot of audience overlap between an R-rated comedy about a raunchy, pansexual superhero and a PG-rated Disney cartoon whose heroine is a chirpy-voiced bunny named Judy Hopps.

Still, as the residents of "Zootopia" learn, it's not wise to underestimate Officer Hopps or the power of her perky persistence.

'Fargo': 10 Things You (Probably) Didn't Know About the Coen Brothers' Classic

$
0
0
Has it really been 20 years since the release of "Fargo?" Yah, you betcha.

The snowbound crime comedy-drama, released March 8, 1996, marked the first mainstream smash for Joel and Ethan Coen. It also gave Frances McDormand and William H. Macy their signature roles, spawned the acclaimed FX drama series, and sparked a brief fad that had everyone talking with exaggerated Minne-soh-ta accents.

Still, two decades after the film's debut, there's still a lot of confusion about what in "Fargo" was truth, what was fiction, and what was an elaborate in-joke. Here, then, are the far-fetched facts behind the film.1. The opening title card claims the movie is based on a true story, but in fact, it's almost completely fictional. There was, however, a real-life crime with some superficial similarities. The victim was Helle Crafts, a Connecticut woman who disappeared in 1986. Her husband was ultimately convicted of her murder; investigators determined that he'd used a wood chipper to destroy her remains.

2. Macy was initially considered for a minor role in "Fargo," but he so desperately wanted the lead role of kidnap-plot instigator Jerry Lundegaard that he flew to New York to crash the auditions and told the Coens, "I'm afraid you're going to screw up your movie and cast someone else in this role." Then the former veterinary student threatened to shoot Ethan's dog if they didn't cast him.
3. McDormand became a mom shortly before filming began -- after a decade of marriage, she and Joel adopted a baby they named Pedro -- but her massive pregnancy bump in "Fargo" was a prosthetic, filled with birdseed. McDormand did research by meeting with an actual pregnant cop from the Twin Cities. "In St. Paul, I met Officer Nancy, who was seven months pregnant and still working," McDormand recalled at the time. "She was on the vice squad doing search and seizure. She was going to go into the office and do a desk job in the middle of her eighth month, but until then, she was still out there doing it."

4. If you watch the closing credits, you'll see that "Victim in Field" was played by someone whose name looks suspiciously like Prince's logo, back when he was using the glyph and calling himself "the Artist Formerly Known as Prince." But that corpse wasn't the Minneapolis music legend; rather it was "Fargo" storyboard artist J. Todd Anderson. Explained Ethan, "The storyboard artist formerly known as J. Todd Anderson decided he no longer wanted to go by that name."
5. Distributor Gramercy drummed up interest among critics with a promotional gift: a snow globe encasing a diorama of the wood chipper scene, complete with bloody red flakes that would scatter when you shook the globe. By the way, the Fargo, N.D. visitor's center claims to have the wood chipper from the film on display, and tourists can pose for pictures with the prop and a mannequin leg sticking out of it.

6. The movie cost a reported $7 million to make. It earned back $61 million worldwide, making it the Coens' biggest hit at the time.7. At the 1997 Oscars (above), McDormand won Best Actress, while the Coen brothers won Best Original Screenplay. Also nominated were Macy (for Best Supporting Actor), cinematographer Roger Deakins, Ethan (for Best Picture, as producer), Joel (for directing), and editor Roderick Jaynes. Since Jaynes was a pseudonym for the writer/director/producer brothers themselves, the Coens wanted to have their "Miller's Crossing" star, Albert Finney, accept the award for Jaynes. The point became moot when Jaynes didn't win.

8. In 2001, a woman from Tokyo named Takako Konishi was found dead in a field near Detroit Lakes, Minnesota. She had apparently gone there to commit suicide after traveling to Minneapolis, where her ex-lover lived, but a colorful rumor was spread that she had come to the region, believing that "Fargo" was a true story, to search for the ransom-money briefcase buried in the snow by Steve Buscemi's character. This urban legend inspired the 2003 documentary "This Is a True Story" and the 2014 movie drama "Kumiko, the Treasure Hunter." 9. In 1997, 17 years before the FX series debuted, there was an early, failed attempt to launch a "Fargo" TV spinoff. Edie Falco was cast as Marge, while Bruce Bohne reprised his movie role as Officer Lou. Kathy Bates, who had lived with Joel and Frances in the 1980s before "Misery" made her famous, directed the pilot episode for the proposed series.

10. Despite the title "Fargo," almost all of the movie takes place in Minnesota and was shot on location there. So why call it "Fargo?" Said Ethan, "We just felt [the town of] 'Brainerd' was not cool enough."


11 Greatest Female BAMFs in Movie History

$
0
0
What's the legacy of "La Femme Nikita," which opened stateside 25 years ago this week?

Well, it spawned an American remake ("Point of No Return"), two TV series, and a filmmaking career (Luc Besson's) centered on telling stories of strong women fighting against a world of brutality and betrayal. But it also spawned a new kind of action heroine: sexy, stylish, lethal, full of attitude -- and not afraid to show the emotional toll of her violent ways. Here, then, is a celebration of Nikita and the badass heroines who have followed in her stiletto-heeled footsteps.

6 Reasons '10 Cloverfield Lane' Took the Box Office by Surprise

$
0
0
Two months ago, no one had heard of "10 Cloverfield Lane." Today, it's a smash hit.

The low-budget thriller, made by a first-time director and featuring no big box office draws, opened with an estimated $25.2 million. It beat three other new wide releases, none of which even managed to open in the top five. The only movie that could beat it was Disney's unstoppable cartoon "Zootopia," which lost a third of last weekend's business and still earned an estimated $50.0 million in its second weekend.

How did the "Cloverfield Lane" filmmakers and distributor Paramount pull off such a feat? Here are six ways the film became a stealth hit.

1. J.J. Abrams
By now, the "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" director is a one-man brand, even if, as in this case, he merely produced the film and didn't write or direct it. Fans know him for quality genre material, especially sci-fi action thrillers. And they also know he has a reputation for secrecy, having managed to keep major plot twists under wraps for mega-franchises like "Star Wars" and "Star Trek." That's become part of the fun in his movies and TV shows -- and, now, for anything under the "Cloverfield" brand.

2. The "Cloverfield" Connection
The 2008 found-footage monster movie helped make Abrams' reputation as a master of viral marketing, able to sneak up an audience with a movie thanks to his Mystery Box. When it was first advertised, no one knew what the movie was about, who was in it, or even what it was called -- until shortly before it appeared in theaters. The first trailer ended with a mic-drop of a last scene -- the Statue of Liberty's head rolling to a stop on a NYC street -- and a release date. That's it.

Abrams and Paramount used similar tactics this time, producing the movie under the fake, nondescript title "Valencia," casting it with actors who wouldn't draw much attention (in this case, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, John Goodman, and John Gallagher Jr.), hiring a first-time feature director (Dan Trachtenberg), and hiding the movie from the world until just two months before its release.

Team Abrams has been referring to this film not as a direct follow-up but as a "spiritual sequel" or "blood relative" to "Cloverfield," with the goal being to establish both films in a "Cloververse" -- a franchise comprised of "Twilight Zone"-like anthology entries that may connect later. Still, the title helps establish "Cloverfield" as a brand, even a franchise, no matter how loosely the movies are related. That drums up audience interest in a certain kind of movie, where the low-budget, low star-wattage cast and viral marketing all become part of what viewers have come to expect from the "Cloverfield" experience.

Analysts, too, didn't expect much. Even Paramount predicted the movie would premiere in the low teens. Of course, such low expectations worked to the film's advantage. Had it opened poorly, it wouldn't have been a disappointment, but at $25.2 million, it's a pleasantly-surprising overachiever. At any rate, Paramount is certain to recoup the film's budget and probably even make a tidy profit, so the movie is a hit on its own terms, even if it struggles to reach the $80 million gross ultimately earned by director Matt Reeves' first film.

3. It Knew Its Audience
Abrams' movies are often a throwback to the kinds of films the 49-year-old enjoyed as a kid, whether it's the Spielbergian "Super 8" or the rebooted "Star Wars." With its bomb bunker setting, "10 Cloverfield Lane" taps into Cold War paranoia that informed apocalyptic thrillers (and daily life in America) up through the 1980s but that few younger viewers have experienced. No wonder the movie drew an audience that was 68 percent over the age of 25. It helped that the film got strong reviews (91 percent fresh at Rotten Tomatoes), since that's the demographic that still responds to film critics.

4. Guy Appeal
It's worth noting that the movie's predominantly male audience had no problem identifying with a strong, heroic female lead, played by Winstead. That's not a new idea to Abrams, whose multi-layered, hard-charging heroines range from Sydney Bristow in "Alias" to Rey in "The Force Awakens." But it's still enough of a novelty in Hollywood that it would be nice if this were the one element of the Abrams formula that the rest of the industry could mimic.

5. Timing
"10 Cloverfield Lane" was fortunate in its choice of competitors. Sure, it wasn't going to pose any threat to "Zootopia," but it wasn't really going after the same family audience anyway. And new releases "The Perfect Match," "The Young Messiah," and "The Brothers Grimsby" failed to garner the critical praise or audience interest that Bad Robot's newest release did, so no threat there. Adding up all three films' opening weekends doesn't come close to half of what "Cloverfield Lane" earned.

6. Execution
This image released by Paramount Pictures shows Mary Elizabeth Winstead in a scene from "10 Cloverfield Lane." (Michele K. Short/Paramount Pictures via AP)None of this would matter if viewers didn't think the movie delivered. Inevitably, some were disappointed with the twists and potentially mislead by the marketing campaign's "Cloverfield" tie-in, hence the B- CinemaScore. Audiences tend to give lower grades when they find something other than what was promised, or they expected. But again, expectations were low, so most critics and many ticketbuyers were pleasantly surprised.

"10 Cloverfield Lane" cleared that low bar, both for fans and for Paramount's accountants. Which means we probably won't have to wait another eight years for another stealth "Cloverfield" attack.

'V for Vendetta': 10 Things You (Probably) Didn't Know About the Controversial Film

$
0
0
"V for Vendetta" has only come to look more prophetic in the decade since its release on March 17, 2006.

The adaptation of the Alan Moore/David Lloyd graphic novel, starring Hugo Weaving and Natalie Portman as a vengeful anarchist and his protege fighting a fascist government in a near-future England, proved to be the biggest critical and commercial success for producers the Wachowskis since "The Matrix." It also popularized the Guy Fawkes mask that has been a favorite of real-life protesters worldwide.

As iconic as the movie became, "Vendetta" ran into numerous obstacles during its production -- and many controversies upon its release. Here are ten things you need to know about the fan-favorite.
1. After making three "Matrix" movies, Andy and Larry Wachowski (now Lilly and Lana, respectively) dusted off a screenplay for "Vendetta" they'd written years earlier, before they had the clout to make it. Wanting a break from directing, they produced the film, but handed over the director's chair to James McTeigue, who'd been their first assistant director on the "Matrix" films.

2. James Purefoy was cast as V, but left the film six weeks into production because he was having difficulty giving his entire performance from behind a mask. "Matrix" villain Weaving replaced him and said he drew upon the mask training he'd done at drama school.
3. Portman, whose orphaned Evey is rescued and indoctrinated by V, gets her head shaved in the film. And Portman did indeed get shorn for real on camera.

4. Portman worked with McTeigue before, when he was the first AD on "Star Wars: Episode II -- Attack of the Clones."

5. Many indoor scenes were filmed at Germany's Babelsberg studio, where Fritz Lang shot the landmark "Metropolis" -- another story of a future underground revolt against oppression -- almost 80 years earlier.6. The movie's climax (pictured), involving thousands of masked rebels marching in London's Whitehall area, required the neighborhood to be cleared after midnight for four nights of filming. It was a first for the district, home to Trafalgar Square, the prime minister's residence and the Houses of Parliament. Co-star Stephen Fry joked that production assistant Euan Blair, son of then-prime minister Tony Blair, pulled strings to get the necessary clearances.

7. The finished film was also criticized for plot points that seemed to echo the London subway bombings, which occurred as the movie was being edited in 2005. "There are tragic events you can in no way condone," McTeigue said of the movie's life-imitates-art moments. "But what's interesting about this film is that it asks questions about why these things happen."
8. As he had with other movie projects based on his writings, including "From Hell" and "The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen" (and later, "Watchmen"), Alan Moore disavowed the movie, asked to have his name removed from the credits, and refused to accept royalties. Moore complained that the screenplay, which he had nothing to do with writing, had Hollywood-ized his story and turned what had been a jeremiad against Margaret Thatcher's regime into an American allegory about George W. Bush.

9. The film cost a reported $54 million to make. It earned back $70.5 million in America and another $62 million overseas.
10. The Guy Fawkes masks Lloyd designed for the book -- and the film -- became a symbol and tool beloved by protesters the world over. They were especially prominent during the Occupy Wall Street protests in 2011. "The Guy Fawkes mask has now become a common brand and a convenient placard to use in protest against tyranny," observed Lloyd, who visited the OWS sit-in at New York's Zuccotti Park and saw his handiwork up close, "and I'm happy with people using it.

Still, some anti-corporate protesters grumbled that the purchase of the masks was counterproductive, since it only put royalty money in the pockets of the giant Time Warner corporation.

What Happened to 'Allegiant' at the Box Office?

$
0
0
'The Divergent Series: Allegiant'In its opening weekend, "The Divergent Series: Allegiant" was supposed to give the still-strong "Zootopia" a run for its money. Analysts predicted that both the hit Disney cartoon and the third installment of the YA franchise would reach about $35 million.

As it turned out, "Zootopia" did even better than expected, losing just 26 percent of last week's business and grabbing another estimated $38.0 million, good enough to spend a third weekend in the top spot. But the competition wasn't even close. "Allegiant" came in nearly $9 million behind, with an estimated $29.0 million. That's the franchise's lowest opening yet.

"Allegiant" should have done a lot better; at the very least, it should have held its own against a movie that's been out for almost a month. So, what happened? Here are five areas where Tris and her team ran into trouble.

1. Negative Reactions to the Book
Like other young-adult fantasy franchises, the "Divergent" movies have banked on the popularity of the best-selling books they came from, as well as the storytelling skills of the authors who created them.

But even among fans of Veronica Roth's novels, "Allegiant" was a controversial book that outraged many readers. Even though the ending that prompted the "WTF?" reaction from readers doesn't happen yet in the "Allegiant" movie (fans might see it in 2017's "Ascendant"), that sense of disappointment surely kept many "Divergent" fans from wanting to see even this first half of the two-film finale.

2. Splitting the Movie In Half
The tactic of splitting a franchise finale into two parts, which made some sense with the plot-heavy "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows," has increasingly come to appear to fans as a cynical cash grab.

The first-half-of-a-finale movies, like "The Hunger Games: Mockingjay, Part 1" or "Allegiant," often feel like throat-clearing, all exposition and set-up and no payoff. They don't feel like organic, stand-alone movies, like the earlier chapters. The stories and characters feel stretched thin, as if to justify such a film's running time. It's no wonder that fans often feel like skipping the second-to-last movie in a series and waiting until the actual finale. It feels even more problematic to split the adaptation of a book few liked in half -- why would they pay to see two installments when they weren't too keen on the whole thing the first time?

3. The Execution
"Allegiant" might still have drawn fans if the film had been well-made. But it wasn't, according to critics, who gave the film a terrible 10 percent on Rotten Tomatoes. Ticketbuyers weren't much kinder, giving the film a B grade at CinemaScore, indicating weak word-of-mouth.

4. Poor Timing
The third week in March may have worked well for the first two movies, but this time around, "Allegiant" ran into tough competition. There was "Zootopia," of course, which was built to appeal to older audiences -- as well as tots. There was also the new "Miracles From Heaven," the faith-based drama starring Jennifer Garner, which did better than expected with an estimated $15.0 million.

There's "10 Cloverfield Lane," which cut into "Allegiant's" audience to earn $12.5 million in its second weekend. And for older teens, "Deadpool" is still raking it in, earning an estimated $8.0 million in its sixth weekend. Even without the R-rated superhero movie, there were still plenty of acclaimed, teen-friendly options to compete with Tris' latest PG-13-rated outing.

5. Fading Interest In the Genre
The problem may be bigger than "The Divergent Series." It's also possible that the whole young-adult fantasy/post-apocalyptic future genre is played out. "The Hunger Games" saw diminishing returns with the final two movies. The second "Maze Runner" movie in 2015 earned 20 percent less than the first one. The latest attempt at launching a franchise in the genre, January's "The 5th Wave," stalled out at around $34 million.

It's clear that distributor Lionsgate expects big things from the franchise closer, "Ascendant" -- instead of releasing it next March, it's coming out June 2017, at the height of summer blockbuster season. But if the audience has moved on, not just from "Divergent," but from the whole genre, then summer dollars aren't going to redeem the downturn the series is seeing.

If the studios don't figure out what the next big thing is for the audience that made Lionsgate's "Twilight" and "Hunger Games" franchises so huge over the past decade, they may as well rename the final movie "Obsolescent."

5 Underrated Ben Affleck Movies You Need to See

$
0
0
Reportedly, the filmmakers of "Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice" (opening March 25) cast Ben Affleck as the Dark Knight because they wanted a slightly older Batman with some gravitas.

Now, you're probably chuckling and thinking, "Ben Affleck? Gravitas?" But give the man some credit.

At age 43, after 35 years in show business -- and 19 in the celebrity tabloid wringer -- Affleck has more world-weariness and life experience than you might think. Indeed, he's always been an underrated actor, and at times, he's been able to use that reputation to his advantage. Here are five Affleck turns that were dismissed or undervalued at the time but are ripe for rediscovery now.
Viewing all 949 articles
Browse latest View live